The Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in TAQA Bratani Limited (“TAQA”) & Others v Fujairah Oil & Gas UK LLC & Others [2025] EWCA Civ 1669 provides clarity on how the Court will approach the question of whether a transaction, is a transaction at an undervalue caught under s.238 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (“Act”). … Continue Reading
Ahead of the Insolvency Rules Review expected this summer, the Insolvency Service have published a new statutory instrument (SI) that will come into force on 22 June. This seeks to tidy up a few of the “niggles” found in the Insolvency Rules 2016 (Rules) that have caused practitioners a headache, as well as making a … Continue Reading
When Waldorf Production UK Plc returned to court with its second restructuring plan in a year, the primary opposition it faced was from HMRC who voted against the plan. Mr Justice Green ultimately sanctioned the plan, cramming down the liabilities owed to HMRC but the judgment provides some helpful insight into the position taken by … Continue Reading
The Renters Rights Act 2025 (Act), which came into force on 1 May 2026 aims to give private tenants greater security and protection from eviction, in many respects aligning the position with business tenants who are in occupation under a protected business tenancy. For insolvency practitioners (IPs) appointed as administrators or liquidators of a business … Continue Reading
Whilst the Supreme Court’s decision in THG Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2026] UKSC 6 provides clarity on the application of limitation periods in unfair prejudice claims, it raises fresh questions for certain insolvency claims that have traditionally been thought to have limitation periods.… Continue Reading
The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced sweeping changes to address this country’s building safety failures exposed by Grenfell. One of its most significant and arguably most revolutionary remedies introduced by the Act is the Building Liability Order, or BLO, designed to prevent relevant building safety liabilities being left behind in undercapitalised project companies while associated … Continue Reading
There is something to be said for “assume the worst” when it comes to defects in administration appointments and extensions. The court has taken this approach in a few cases where, rather than trying to work out the intricacies and effect of a defect on an appointment or extension, it has assumed the worst (i.e … Continue Reading
The Council of the European Union has just given the green light to a new EU Law that aims to bring consistency to key aspects of insolvency rules across Member States. For years, businesses and investors have had to navigate a patchwork of national regimes—each with its own procedures, timelines, and quirks. The new Directive … Continue Reading
It has been a while since we have had any cases challenging the fairness of a CVA, but in this recent Scottish decision where HMRC challenged the approval of Petrofac’s CVA on the basis of fairness, the court was required to consider HMRC’s contention that the CVA unfairly prejudiced its interests. In The Advocate General … Continue Reading
In Wonop ApS v Jagger (as joint administrator of FAI Realisations 2024 Ltd) [2026] EWHC 362 (Ch) the High Court was required to consider the effect of filing a notice under paragraph 84(4) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 – specifically, whether the registration of such a notice operates automatically to bring an … Continue Reading
The powers of provisional liquidators are generally as set out in the order appointing them. In longer running provisional liquidations, this can lead to multiple trips to court by the provisional liquidators to extend or confirm powers. In Re Versilia Solutions Limited[1] the High Court considered the scope of provisional liquidators’ powers in circumstances where, … Continue Reading
The recent High Court decision in Maher and another v Investalet Ltd [2025] EWHC 3133 (Ch) serves as a critical reminder for insolvency practitioners about the importance of choosing the correct procedural route when seeking possession of property. It is an important case for insolvency practitioners dealing with intermediate landlords and unauthorised occupiers. In this … Continue Reading
The High Court has dismissed the liquidators’ appeal in Webb & another (as joint liquidators of Eversholt Rail (365) Ltd (in liquidation) v another company [2026] EWHC 101 (Ch), reaffirming that requests for information under section 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 must be reasonable. Sections 235 and 236 enable officeholders to uncover … Continue Reading
The recent decision in CDI Realisations Limited is a short one, but it sits against a much longer-running debate about creditor consent for administration extensions and, in particular, when creditor status should be assessed for these purposes. While the facts of CDI are relatively straightforward, the decision is a useful addition to the growing body … Continue Reading
When a business runs into financial difficulties and proposes a Company Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”), landlords, insolvency practitioners and local authorities can disagree about who should pick up the bill for business rates on empty leasehold premises – the landlord, or the company in CVA?… Continue Reading
When a company enters administration, the administrators must set out proposals explaining how they intend to achieve the purpose of the administration, but what happens when creditors refuse to approve those proposals? A recent decision in Re PPE Medpro Limited (in Administration) [2025] EWHC 3449 (Ch) (“PPE Medpro”) provides important clarification. The Statutory Framework … Continue Reading
In a world where it is much more common to send someone a text, a WhatsApp message, email or other electronic communication, than type a letter or put pen to paper, the Court does find itself now and again considering how the digital ways of communicating interact with laws that were introduced way before the … Continue Reading
Following our previous blog Revolution Bars: When is a meeting really a meeting?” Mr Justice Hildyard has, in Re Argo Blockchain Plc[1], affirmed the position that a creditor can only approve a restructuring plan (“RP”) if at least 75% in value of a class of creditors, present and voting either in person or by proxy … Continue Reading
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)[1] upheld an employment tribunal’s decision that the claimant, Mr Chaudhry, could not recover a basic award for unfair dismissal following their employer’s insolvency unless an employment tribunal had determined the claim and made an award. Why is this relevant to administrators? Because for an employee to bring a claim the … Continue Reading
At the beginning of 2025 we shared our predictions on what we expected to see in the R&I market over the course of the year. How did we do? … Continue Reading
Despite meeting statutory jurisdictional requirements under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006, the High Court declined to exercise its discretion in favour of sanctioning Waldorf Production UK Plc’s restructuring plan in August 2025due to concerns about fair allocation of value and lack of meaningful engagement with unsecured creditors. Waldorf then sought and was granted … Continue Reading
On insolvency, the pari passu principle applies, meaning unsecured creditors rank equally in the distribution of available assets. That principle helps explain why a creditor who has obtained a judgment debt but has not completed enforcement (for instance by obtaining a final charging order) will usually be barred from doing so once insolvency intervenes. A … Continue Reading
For reasons explained in this blog, they did not in the case of Conway and others v Plass and others [2025] EWHC 2625 (Ch) but there could be situations where it might. In Conway and others v Plass and others, the High Court has provided guidance on when contract liabilities incurred by administrators will be … Continue Reading
In Re Petrofac Ltd [2025] EWHC 2887 (Ch), the English High Court made an administration order in relation to a Jersey-incorporated company even though its registered office was not in England which is the starting point for determining COMI and therefore the Court’s jurisdiction to make such an order. Background Petrofac Limited (the Company) is the … Continue Reading
