Tag Archives: Dismissal

Bankruptcy Court Doors Swing Open For Cannabis Companies, But Just Slightly

Are bankruptcy doors now opening for cannabis companies?  A decision last week from a California bankruptcy court indicates perhaps so, at least for cannabis companies that are no longer operating. Factual Background The Hacienda Company, LLC (the “Debtor”) was in the business of wholesale manufacturing and packaging cannabis products.  After it ceased operations in February … Continue Reading

Cannabis and Bankruptcy: 2020 in Review

In 2020, bankruptcy court doors continued to be shut to cannabis companies.  Perhaps most troubling is the continued bar for companies that are only tangentially involved in the state-legalized cannabis industry.  Although outlier cases exist, and even though courts have hinted that bankruptcy may be appropriate for some cannabis-related individuals and companies in some situations, … Continue Reading

A TUPE sting in the tail – Project Viva Limited (In Administration)

An employment tribunal has recently confirmed that employees who have been unfairly dismissed from an insolvent employer can bring an action against a connected successor company. The tribunal held that there was a ‘commonality of ownership’ between the original and successor companies and that it was correct as a matter of public policy that employees should be able … Continue Reading

Consult in UK redundancies or be fined…….

The suitability of the collective consultation regime under the Trade Union and Labour Relation (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULRCA”) in an insolvency scenario has always been a hot topic amongst insolvency professionals. The recent case of West Coast Capital (USC) Limited (“USC”) provides a stark example of the hard-line approach the Secretary of State for Business … Continue Reading

The wonder of Woolies – good(ish) news for UK insolvency practitioners

The European Advocate General has today given his opinion in the “Woolworths case” (and two other cases) on the meaning of “establishment” for the purposes of determining when the duty to consult appropriate representatives is triggered under the European Collective Redundancies Directive (the Directive). The good news for insolvency practitioners (IPs) faced with potential consultation is that … Continue Reading

Even the “Cleverly Insidious” Lender Cannot Prevent its Borrower from Filing Bankruptcy

Put your lender’s hat on. Wouldn’t it be great if you could prevent your borrower from filing bankruptcy in the first place? Unfortunately for lenders, a recent decision demonstrates how hard it is to prevent bankruptcy filings. In In re Bay Club Partners-472, LLC, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 2051 (Bankr. D. Or. May 6, 2014), the debtor was a … Continue Reading
LexBlog