Tag Archives: insolvency

HMRC versus Restructuring Plans (UK)

When Waldorf Production UK Plc returned to court with its second restructuring plan in a year, the primary opposition it faced was from HMRC who voted against the plan.   Mr Justice Green ultimately sanctioned the plan, cramming down the liabilities owed to HMRC but the judgment provides some helpful insight into the position taken by … Continue Reading

Can Cannabis Companies File Bankruptcy? The New Chapter 15 Roadmap

Have the doors to U.S. Bankruptcy courts finally swung open to cannabis companies?  Perhaps, but still in only very limited circumstances involving a foreign debtor. Nonetheless, Judge Brendan Shannon’s recent order granting recognition of a Canadian insolvency proceeding [1] filed by a cannabis company is the first crack in the door that many bankruptcy professionals … Continue Reading

(UK) IPs with residential tenanted properties on your cases – have you sent an Information Sheet to tenants?  Time is running out

The Renters Rights Act 2025 (Act), which came into force on 1 May 2026 aims to give private tenants greater security and protection from eviction, in many respects aligning the position with business tenants who are in occupation under a protected business tenancy.  For insolvency practitioners (IPs) appointed as administrators or liquidators of a business … Continue Reading

Building Liability Orders: Group Exposure, Insolvency and Legacy Building Safety Claims

The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced sweeping changes to address this country’s building safety failures exposed by Grenfell. One of its most significant and arguably most revolutionary remedies introduced by the Act is the Building Liability Order, or BLO, designed to prevent relevant building safety liabilities being left behind in undercapitalised project companies while associated … Continue Reading

Purdue Doesn’t Stop Chapter 15 Recognition and Enforcement of Third-Party Releases

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has issued a significant ruling in the cross‑border insolvency practice that reaffirms U.S. recognition of foreign restructuring plans containing third-party releases. Crédito Real S.A.B. DE C.V., SOFOM, E.N.R. (“Crédito Real”) was one of Mexico’s largest non-banking financial lending institutions.  In 2021, Crédito Real experienced a liquidity … Continue Reading

A Holistic Approach to Fairness in CVAs? (UK)

It has been a while since we have had any cases challenging the fairness of a CVA, but in this recent Scottish decision where HMRC challenged the approval of Petrofac’s CVA on the basis of fairness, the court was required to consider HMRC’s contention that the CVA unfairly prejudiced its interests. In The Advocate General … Continue Reading

UK Court Considers the Scope of Provisional Liquidators Powers to Sell the Company’s Assets

The powers of provisional liquidators are generally as set out in the order appointing them.  In longer running provisional liquidations, this can lead to multiple trips to court by the provisional liquidators to extend or confirm powers. In Re Versilia Solutions Limited[1] the High Court considered the scope of provisional liquidators’ powers in circumstances where, … Continue Reading

A Cautionary Tale for Insolvency Practitioners Seeking Possession of Company Property (UK)

The recent High Court decision in Maher and another v Investalet Ltd [2025] EWHC 3133 (Ch) serves as a critical reminder for insolvency practitioners about the importance of choosing the correct procedural route when seeking possession of property. It is an important case for insolvency practitioners dealing with intermediate landlords and unauthorised occupiers. In this … Continue Reading

The District Court for the Southern District of New York Deems Third-Party Releases Non-Consensual under State and Federal Law [US]

On December 1, 2025, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Honorable Denise Cote) entered an opinion and order that struck third-party releases and a related injunction in a confirmed Chapter 11 Plan (the “Plan”) for the In re Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A., et al. bankruptcy cases (Case No. … Continue Reading

Provisional Liquidators, Redundancies and TUPE (UK)

As practitioners will know, when dealing with a sale of an insolvent business they will have to consider whether the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) applies.  TUPE applies to transfers of businesses or undertakings (or parts of them).  If there has been a relevant transfer under regulation 3 of TUPE, then … Continue Reading

Waldorf – Another UK Restructuring Plan is Declined Sanction on the Basis of Fairness and Judicial Discretion

The High Court has refused to use its discretion to sanction a restructuring plan proposed by Waldorf Production UK Plc (Waldorf or the Company) which entailed a cramdown of the company’s unsecured creditors pursuant to Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006. Background Waldorf (and its wider group) are engaged in the exploration and production … Continue Reading

Petrofac in the Court of Appeal: Key Takeaways (UK)

The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in the Petrofac restructuring plan, overturning the sanctioning of the plans by the High Court. This is only the third time a restructuring plan has been considered by the Court of Appeal, in this blog we focus in on some of the key points of interest for … Continue Reading

Ploughing New Furrows: Bestwall, LLC Explores the Limits of Federal Courts’ Bankruptcy Jurisdiction with Novel Arguments (US)

What does it mean to be “bankrupt?”  The Fourth Circuit recently held oral arguments to determine this question in Bestwall, LLC v. The Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants.[1]  There, the Asbestos Claimants asserted that the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina (the “Bankruptcy Court”) lacks jurisdiction over Bestwall, because Bestwall … Continue Reading

LPA Receivers – who is really responsible for their actions? (UK)

In the recent appeal of Yerbury v Azets[1], the Court reiterated that an employer of an LPA receiver cannot be held vicariously liable for the actions of a receiver during a receivership and helpfully clarified the parameters of the receiver’s role by virtue of their appointment. In this blog, we delve further into the High … Continue Reading
LexBlog